In re: Jones et al. v. Lake Michigan Credit Union, No. 20-000240-CK (Washtenaw County, Michigan, Circuit Court, Oct. 12, 2022). $7.5 million class action settlement, including fee refunds and debt forgiveness, for consumers alleging assessment of improper bank fees class settlement.

In re: Stillgood Prods., LLC v. Wesbanco Bank, Inc., No. 4:21-cv-00018-SEB-DML (S.D. Indiana, Dec. 16, 2022), ECF No. 58. $6.45 million class action settlement, including refunds of bank fees challenged by consumer classes and debt forgiveness.

In re: Perkins v. Vantage Credit Union, No. 21SL-CC03736 (St. Louis County, Missouri, Circuit Court, Aug. 25, 2023). Preliminary approval of nearly $6.1 million bank fee class settlement, including changes to future fee assessment practices.

In re: Lowe et al. v. NBT Bank, No. 3:19-cv-01400-MAD-ML (N.D. New York, Sep. 30, 2022), ECF No. 104. $5.7 million bank fee class action settlement. 

In re: Louden v. Arvest Bank, No. 60CV-19-5520 (Pulaski County, Arkansas, Circuit Court, June 8, 2021). Final approval of a bank fee class settlement valued at more than $4.7 million, including a $1.7 million settlement fund and more than $3 million in debt forgiveness.

In re: Bradley v. First Security Bank, No. 58CV-19-317 (Pope County, Arkansas, Circuit Court, June 5, 2023). Preliminary approval of a bank fee class settlement valued at $4.575 million and comprised of a $1.575 million settlement fund and $3 million in debt forgiveness.

In re: Terrell v. Fort Knox Federal Credit Union, No. 19-CI-01281 (Hardin County, Kentucky, Circuit Court, Oct. 2, 2020). Final approval of a $4.5 million bank fee class settlement.

In re: Blankenship v. HAPO Community Credit Union, No. 19-2-00922-03 (Benton County, Washington, Superior Court, Feb. 3, 2023). Final approval of a $4.5 million bank fee class settlement.

In re: Smiley v. First National Bank, No. 43CV-20-531 (Lonoke County, Arkansas, Circuit Court, Oct. 20, 2022). Final approval of a bank fee class settlement valued at $4.25 million and comprised of a $1.25 million settlement fund and approximately $3 million in debt forgiveness.

In re: Walkingstick et al. v. Simmons Bank, No. 6:19-cv-03184-RK (W.D. Missouri, Nov. 15, 2022), ECF No. 167. Final approval of a bank fee class settlement valued at more than $4 million, including a $3.25 million settlement fund and more than $753,000 in debt forgiveness.

In re: James v. Georgia United Credit Union, No. 19-A-09050-7 (Gwinnett County, Georgia, Superior Court, March. 18, 2022). Final approval of a $4 million bank fee class settlement comprised of a $3.25 million settlement fund and approximately $750,000 in debt forgiveness.

In re: Howell et al. v. Eastman Credit Union, No. C42517 (Sullivan County, Tennessee, Circuit Court, Oct. 20, 2021). Final approval of a $3.25 million bank fee class settlement.

In re: Holt v. Community America Credit Union, No. 4:19-cv-00629-FJG (W.D. Missouri, Dec. 8, 2020), ECF No. 51. Final approval of a bank fee class settlement valued at nearly $3.1 million and comprised of a $2.325 million settlement fund and $753,436 in debt forgiveness.

In re: Thornton v. German American Bancorp, Inc., No. 49D01-2007-PL-022667 (Marion County, Indiana, Superior Court, Indiana Commercial Court, Aug. 1, 2022). Final approval of a $3.05 million bank fee class settlement.

In re: Pace v. Landmark Bank, No. 20BA-CV00244 (Boone County, Missouri, Circuit Court, Jan. 19, 2023). Final approval of a $2.75 million bank fee class settlement.

In re: Martin v. L&N Fed. Credit Union, No. 19-CI-002873 (Jefferson County, Kentucky, Circuit Court, June 8, 2020). Final approval of a nearly $2.6 million bank fee class settlement. 

In re: Bowen v. Commonwealth Credit Union, No. 19-CI-00416 (Franklin County, Kentucky, Circuit Court, Jan. 20, 2022). Final approval of a $2.4 million bank fee class settlement.

In re: South v. OnPoint Community Credit Union, No. 21CV06289 (Multnomah County, Oregon, Circuit Court, Aug. 9, 2023). Final approval for $2 million bank fee class settlement.

In re: Willard et al. v. Oregon Community Credit Union, No. 19CV53047 (Oregon Circuit Court, May 16, 2023). Preliminary approval of a $1.975 bank fee class settlement.

In re: Norwood v. Camden National Bank, No. BCD-CV-2020-13 (Cumberland County, Maine, Maine Business and Consumer Court, Dec. 11, 2020). Final approval of a nearly $1.7 million bank fee class settlement comprised of a $1.2 million settlement fund and nearly $500,000 in debt forgiveness.

In re: Eisenberg et al. v. Columbia Bank, No. BER-L-006636-21 (Bergen County, New Jersey, Superior Court, Apr. 25, 2023). Preliminary approval of a bank fee class settlement valued at $1.7 million and comprised of a $1.5 million settlement fund and $200,000 in debt forgiveness.

In re: Hinton v. Atlantic Union Bank, No. 3:20-cv-00651-JAG (E.D. Virginia, March. 31, 2022), ECF No. 30. Final approval of a $1.6 million bank fee class settlement.

In re: Rodriguez v. MECU Credit Union, No. 24-C-22-002371 (Baltimore City, Maryland, Circuit Court, Aug. 15, 2023). Preliminary approval of $1.5 million bank fee class settlement.

In re: Walker et al. v. American Heritage Bank, No. CJ-2021-212 (Creek County, Oklahoma, District Court, June 8, 2023). Preliminary approval of a bank fee class settlement that created a $1.35 million settlement fund.

In re: Sempek v. Centris Federal Credit Union, No. CI 22-4495 (Douglas County, Nebraska, District Court, July 31, 2023). Preliminary approval of a bank fee class settlement valued at $1,236,762 and comprised of a $1.2 million settlement fund and $36,762 in debt forgiveness.

In re: Metler v. First International Bank & Trust, No. 09-2022-CV-01119 (North Dakota District Court, July 20, 2023). Final approval of a bank fee class settlement that created a $1.1 million settlement fund.

In re: Yarski v. Knoxville TVA Employees Credit Union, No. 3-220-19 (Knox County, Tennessee, Circuit Court, July 21, 2021). Final approval of a $1.1 million bank fee class settlement fund.

In re: Hairston v. United Community Bank, No. 2020L 001749 (Madison County, Illinois, Circuit Court, Oct. 20, 2022). Final approval of a $1.1 million bank fee class settlement fund.

In re: Gonzalez et al. v. Banner Bank, No. 4:20-cv-05151-TOR (E.D. Washington, Feb. 11, 2022), ECF No. 51. Final approval of a $1 million bank fee class settlement fund.

Davidson County Circuit Court (Nashville) bench trial verdict of $205,274.24 following zero offers made prior to trial (January 2022). (Frieda Woolridge v. Mid-Cumberland Human Resource Agency et al., Davidson County Circuit Court, Docket No. 19C482). Member Isaac Kimes was First Chair Trial Lawyer. 

$300,000 policy limits settlement on auto-wreck case (April 2023).

$500,000 policy limits settlement on auto-wreck case (July 2023)

$450,000 settlement on contested liability auto v. pedestrian case (July 2023).

$200,000 settlement on auto-wreck case (September 2023).

$755,000 settlement on premises liability case (November 2023).

$650,000 settlement on contested liability trucking case (December 2023).

In re: Davidson v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. and Ford Motor Co. No. 00-C2298 (Davidson Circuit, Tennessee) (Soloman/Brothers). The firm served as lead counsel in a nationwide class action against Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. and Ford Motor Co. concerning defective tires. A settlement valued at $34.4 million was reached in conjunction with a companion case in Texas.

In re: Cox v. Shell Oil et al., Civ. No. 18844 (Weakley Chancery, Tennessee) (Judge Malon). The firm intervened in a consumer class action composed of all persons throughout the United States who owned or purchased defective polybutylene piping systems used in residential constructions or mobile homes. A global settlement was reached that was valued at $1 billion.

In re: Heilman et al. v. Perfection Corporation, et al., Civ. No. 99-0679-CD-W-6 (W.D. Missouri). The firm served on the executive committee in a nationwide consumer class action composed of all owners or purchasers of a defective hot water heater. A settlement was reached that provided 100% recovery of damages for a possible 14.2 million hot water heaters and any other property damages.

In re: Alpha Corp. Securities litigation. Founding and Managing Member J. Gerard Stranch IV was appointed as co-lead counsel. The case resulted in $161 million recovery for the class.

In re: McKenzie et al. v. Allconnect, Inc., 5:18-cv-00359 (E.D. Kentucky) (J. Hood). The firm served as class counsel in an action brought on behalf of more than 1,800 current and former employees of Allconnect, Inc., whose sensitive information contained in W-2 statements was disclosed to an unauthorized third party who sought the information through an email phishing scheme. The firm negotiated a settlement providing for direct cash payments to all class members, credit monitoring and identity theft protection plan at no cost, capped reimbursement of documented economic losses incurred per class member and other remedial measures. The approximately $2.2 million settlement value is one of the largest per capita recoveries in a W-2 phishing litigation.

In re: Monegato v. Fertility Centers of Illinois, PLLC, Case No. 2022 CH 00810 (Cook County Circuit Court). The firm served as class counsel in a case brought on behalf of approximately 80,000 individuals whose personal information was involved in a February 2021 data breach. A settlement with a total estimated value of $14.5 million was negotiated. Final approval was granted by the Cook County, Illinois Circuit Court in April 2023.

In re: Winsouth Credit Union v. Mapco Express Inc., and Phillips v. Mapco Express, Inc. Case Nos. 3:14-cv-1573 and 1710 (M.D. Tennessee) (J. Crenshaw). The firm served as liaison counsel in consumer and financial institution action stemming from the 2013 hacking of computer systems maintained by Mapco Express, Inc. The cases settled in 2017 for approximately $2 million.

In re: Owens, et al. v. U.S. Radiology Specialists, et al., Case No. 22 CVS 17797 (Mecklenburg, North Carolina Supreme Court). The firm served as plaintiffs’ counsel in action brought on behalf of approximately 1.3 million individuals whose sensitive, personal information was potentially compromised in defendants’ December 2021 data security incident. Along with co-counsel, the firm negotiated a $5,050,000 non-reversionary common fund settlement including pro rata cash payments, reimbursement of up to $5,000 for out-of-pocket expenses traceable to the data breach per person, compensation for lost time and verified fraud reimbursement. Preliminary approval pending.

In re: Larson v. Aditi Consulting, LLC, Case No. 22-2-03572-2 SEA (King County, Washington Supreme Court). Final approval was granted July 14, 2023.

In re: Carr v. South Country Health Alliance, Case No. 74-CV-21-632 (Steele County, Minnesota District Court). Final approval was granted Nov. 6, 2023.

In re: Reese v. Teen Challenge Training Center, Inc., Case No. 210400093 (Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas) Final approval pending.

In re: Joyner v. Behavioral Health Network, Inc., No. 2017CV00629 (Massachusetts Supreme Court). A non-reversionary common fund of $1,200,000 was established to provide credit monitoring, and cover claims of economic loss up to $10,000 and non-economic loss up to $1,000 for lost time for each of the approximately 133,237 class members.

In re: Davidson v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. and Ford Motor Co. No. 00-C2298 (Davidson Circuit, Tennessee) (Soloman/Brothers). The firm served as lead counsel in a nationwide class action against Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. and Ford Motor Co. concerning defective tires. A settlement valued at $34.4 million was reached in conjunction with a companion case in Texas.

In re: Montanez v. Gerber Childrenswear, LLC (M.D. California). The firm represented consumers who purchased baby clothing tainted with unlawful levels of chemical skin irritants, resulting in a multi-million-dollar settlement.

In re: Cox v. Shell Oil et al., Civ. No. 18844 (Weakley Chancery, Tennessee) (Judge Malon). The firm intervened in consumer action composed of all persons throughout the United States who owned or purchased defective polybutylene piping systems used in residential constructions or mobile homes. A global settlement was reached that was valued at $1 billion.

In re: Heilman et al. v. Perfection Corporation, et al., Civ. No. 99-0679-CD-W-6 (W.D. Missouri). The firm served on the executive committee in a nationwide consumer class action composed of all owners or purchasers of a defective hot water heater. A settlement was reached that provided 100% recovery of damages for a possible 14.2 million hot water heaters and any other property damages.